A Memory of Mike Brumley

A good friend reached out the other day to tell me that Mike Brumley had tragically passed away after a traffic accident. Since that time there have been a number of news articles written about his devotion to his family and baseball. Players talking about how much of a positive influence he was in their careers. This was a terrible loss.

I met Brumley only once, briefly, in 1992. He had already been with the Cubs, Tigers, Mariners and Red Sox. Quite frankly he was already on the downside of his playing career. It was in Winter Haven Florida on the back field reserved for AAA and AA players. He was working, as he always did, talking with Jim Rice about hitting and taking BP. He ended up having only 1 at bat for the Red Sox that year and spent the year with AAA Pawtucket. He would have only 54 more MLB at bats before retiring.

On this day he cracked his bat. The barrel was wrapped with tape to prevent chipping and cracking. Players who did not get a large order of bats often did this to make them last longer. I was standing by the 3.5 foot high fence, alone, drinking in the advice from Rice. I had collected cards and autographs in the past, and I cautiously asked Brumley for the bat.

He handed it to me and said something like “they got it wrong.” This was my first cracked bat and the only bat I have ever been handed by a player after he cracked it. With over 1000 bats after this, I still remember him handing me this bat and wonder whether I would have even collected bats but for his simple generosity.

I flew back to school in Pensylvania and soon thereafter received the Sports Illustrated baseball issue in the mail. Before the internet, this was one of the few places to read behind the scenes articles. I quickly thumbed to the Red Sox discussion and read the below.

I peeled the tape off the barrel of the bat Brumley had handed me and, sure enough, it said MIKE BUMLEY.

I am sure that he would have preferred that all these mistake bats were tossed never to be seen again. Most players probably would not have even used them, and certainly would not have given any away. Brumley was a gamer and a grinder. Thank you Mike for starting my collection, yours will ALWAYS be my favorite bat. Sincere condolences to your family.

Yaz, Kissinger, Cronin and the 75 World Series

Old school World Series branded bats are rare and, depending on the player, Hillerich & Bradsby record suggest that historically either 2 or 4 were made for each player. Red Sox World Series bats from 1975, given the legendary nature of the series, are particularly tough.  These bats are also frequently found unused as the players get them immediately before the Series and often keep them as souvenirs.

Yastrzemski 1975 World Series Bat

We recently added this Yastrzemski 1975 World Series bat to the collection.  It is unused with Yaz’s 8 on the knob.  At first I was not thrilled with the multiple autographs on the bat.  Not a huge fan of autographs beyond the player unless it is a team autographed bat.  But then curiosity got the better of me, how and when were the signatures added to the bat?  And why would someone add these signatures to an incredible bat in it’s own right?

The large and distinct signature was easily identified as that of Henry Kissinger, not an autograph typically found on a baseball bat.

The second signature is that of Joe Cronin.

Cronin the former Red Sox player, coach, and general manager was also the President of the American League.  Not to mention a 1956 inductee into the Baseball Hall of Fame.  But his tenure as League President ended in 1973.

But why in the world would someone collect those two signatures on a Yaz World Series bat?

AP Images provided the first clue as a beaming Yaz is photographed chatting with Kissinger before game 2 of the 75 World Series played on October 12, 1975.

Kissinger was also photographed in a pose throwing out the first ball.

But Cronin?  Off to newspapers.com (which I will say as an aside is an INCREDIBLE resource for even the smallest historic tidbits) to unearth this little tidbit side note.

Some would have the signatures removed to return the bat to a pristine state, or leave only the Yastrzemski signature.  Not me, this is just another great piece of history in its own right with an interesting story that in my view raises the historic value.  The hobby has a way of delivering gems.

Enjoy your collecting!

Red Sox "Walk-Off City" - Super Rare Walk-Off Bats

The other day Rafael Devers squirted a single through a drawn in infield and the Sox had the latest installment of “Walk-Off City.” It is one of the most joyful moments in baseball, your teammates tear out of the dugout to chase you and, of course, you are at home and the crowd goes wild. A Gatorade shower is most definitely in your future.

Many players will say that they had never done it at any level, including little league. We have not researched the scarcity of a walk-off but it must be rare. . . .right?

Here are three Red Sox bats that drove in that final game ending run.

  1. Herrera Walks It Off On The 5th Of July 7/5/14

2015-12-27 22.39.23.png
HererraE 2.gif
Herrera.gif

2. Xander Does It In Grand Style 7/14/18

Xander Newspaper.png
BogaertsX 7.jpg
gettyimages-1000331608-1024x1024.jpg

3. Cody Ross Caps a Home Run Binge 7/20/12

Screen Shot 2014-02-08 at 8.17.00 PM.png
Screenshot 2019-04-21 21.09.15.png
Ross 7-19-12 photomatch walkoff.gif

Collecting Game Used Bases: An Ortiz 2013 Playoff Grand Slam

Even though they have been collected by the grounds crew and hologrammed for years, I am a relative newcomer to collecting game used bases.  That does not mean that I was unaware of bases, it was more of a “what can I really do with this” attitude.  They are difficult to frame or display.  Even if you want to lay a few out, that can be awkward.  Many collectors have one or two but the collecting “completists” among us have a tough time finding satisfaction in that pursuit. Further, they can be pricey, even when it comes to the more common bases, and World Series pricing can be staggering. So I pretty much stayed away.  

However, when I had the opportunity to pick up a fairly historic base in 2013, I jumped at the chance, and added to the collection 3rdbase from innings 7-9 of ALCS game 2 Boston v. Detroit.  It was the bottom of the 8thand the Red Sox were down 5-1 and about to go down 2-0 in the series.  Ortiz was 0-for-6 with four strikeouts in the series at that point, but the Red Sox had the bases loaded with two outs. The Tigers, taking no chances, brought in their closer, Joaquin Benoit, who had never allowed Ortiz an extra base hit in 27 career plate appearances.  Ortiz swung at a first pitch changup and drove it over the right field wall, tying the game, immortalizing bullpen cop Officer Steve Horgan and burnishing his already stellar Hall Of Fame credentials. 

2013 ALCS G2 3rd Base - top.jpg
2013 ALCS G2 3rd Base - jewel 1.jpg

Above is the third base that David Ortiz touched as he headed home having just hit the grand slam. It was also from this base that Jonny Gomes scored the eventual winning run in the bottom of the 9thwhen Jarrod Saltalamaccia walked it off with a single.  I have found that this base resonates with fans and collectors. Rather than a white elephant, it fits with the game used balls, uniforms and bats in a collection from the 2013 playoff run.  Player, team and ballpark collectors could find similar satisfaction when adding a few bases to their collection.

Knob Numbering - A Cautionary Tale Focusing On Boggs Game Used Bats

We have been collecting for over 25 years, have handled more than a thousand Red Sox bats, and looked at probably hundreds of more in auctions and online. At the time we started, there was no such thing as photo matching or video matching and of course no MLB authentication.

The hobby has lurched into the present and now you can screen shot from MLB HD and scour Getty images to photo match bats. But we also very much enjoy the more traditional discussions of authentication that revolve around player use characteristics, trying to determine whether a bat is authentic by studying how a player prepared his bats.

Recently, we have encountered discussions that suggest a "players handwriting" is reflected by the numbers on the knobs, and some limited suggestion that bats without knob numbers written a certain way were "fake" or "fraudulent." Player characteristics are a vital part of authentication, especially for the very valuable high end bat. One might not buy a bat that does not have the typical player characteristics, but this does not necessarily mean the bat is fake or fraudulent. Further, the modern bat faker is likely bright enough to research player characteristics, (yes this actually happens, but that is a story for a different day).

Why choose Boggs for this discussion?  Well he is one of our favorite Red Sox players, his game used bats have always been in high demand and we have seen extensive discussion by collectors and authenticators in the hobby about his habits and the way that numbers were written on the knobs of his bats. A review of Getty Images is replete with pictures that show his typical Red Sox knob numbering like the below:

2015-01-09 21.59.09.png

This has led some people to conclude that Boggs sat in his locker and wrote the knob numbers his bats. Such conversations often turn to discussions of "Boggs' handwriting." We concede that we have no special insight into what he actually did while a Red Sox, we were not in the locker room, and he could have been the one who wrote all the knob numbers.  He certainly had that level of attention to detail when it came to hitting. However,  that is unlikely, at least not in every instance. As evidence we offer a group of numbers written on the knobs of several Red Sox bats, tell me which ones are Boggs written 2s.

boggs knob exemplars.jpg

Answer is None, as you probably guessed, but they look quite close to the purported Boggs handwriting and we could give you dozens more examples.

A review of Boggs online images also reveals tons of images with the more common Boggs numbering, but also several instances of knob numbers that are not the typical numbering style. And these are pictures from approximately 100 at bats of the thousands of at bats he had.

2015-01-09 21.56.42.png
2015-01-09 22.06.17.png
2015-01-09 22.15.41.png

Even PSA has apparently concluded that the knob numbering is not the be all and end all of a Boggs gamer, repeatedly giving Boggs bats with varied knob numbers some of the highest possible grades.

2016-01-02 00.35.46.gif
2016-01-02 00.35.09.gif

Even bats that have one style of numbering on the knob, have been found to have a different style of numbering on the top of the barrel.

2016-01-02 00.42.31.gif

A recent dealer acquisition of Boggs bats sealed this for us, or unsealed it as the case may be. It was a set of early 90s Boggs Red Sox bats, autographed as "game used" by Boggs. However, the knobs reflect no less than three different numbering styles

IMG_0113.gif
IMG_0121.gif

The reality is that bats come into the clubhouse and are shipped and handled in many ways. Could they have been shipped with other bats for spring training and numbered before Boggs got to Fenway or Winter Haven? Possibly. Could they have been mixed and brought on the road necessitating clubhouse staff to number up the knobs? There is a chance. So what is the point here? Bat authentication by player characteristic (particularly the absence of a player characteristic) is an art and not a science. To be clear, there are many game used bats we have passed on because they lacked player characteristics, and if shopping for a Boggs, the more common number would be part of an analysis of fair value, but be cautious before a calling out a bat as fake or fraudulent for lacking those characteristics. Good luck with your collecting!

Cracked or Uncracked, That Is The Question

When we first started collecting bats it is fair to say the we were picky.  If the bat lacked substantial use or had too heavy a crack, we often passed it by with the belief that another would surface.  Of course, when you are trying to collect players from the 1960s and 70s whom spent little time in the majors, you learn the hard lesson that ANY bat must suffice because it may be the ONLY bat you ever find from that player.  These early missed opportunities are a story for a different day.

The question of the moment is given the choice between a cracked bat and an uncracked bat what would you choose and why?  It is likely that most will fall into the camp of uncracked because such bats oftentimes display better, can be held by the owner without concern and raise no issues about missing pieces.  All good points, but give me the cracked bat provided there are no missing pieces.  If the bat has heavy use it is almost assured that the cracked bat saw real use in a game.  There is something noble about the cracked bat, employed by the player until the end of its useful life. 

Also, if the bat lacks MLB Authentication, being cracked IMHO makes it much more likely that the bat is genuine.  It is virtually impossible to fake crack a bat and, besides, who would try to do that and risk ruining the bat?  That used but uncracked bat of a star player leads to questions like, why would a player give that bat up before cracking it?  Of course there are valid explanations, and there is no substitute for the proper player use characteristics, but when the bat is cracked you know the player willingly parted with it.  See many cracked bats in the BAT COLLECTION section of the website

Classic cracked Rick Burleson game used bat

Classic cracked Rick Burleson game used bat